SC returns govt's review plea against Imran’s transfer to Shifa Hospital

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Thursday returned a review petition filed by the federal government against its Aug 18 order for shifting incarcerated PTI founder Imran Khan to Shifa International Hospital. The SC registrar’s office returned the petition, citing incomplete paper books as the reason. An informed source told Dawn that the review petition may be filed afresh with certain amendments along with the appeal against the registrar’s objections. On Tuesday, the SC had ordered the government to shift Imran to Shifa International Hospital within two days for examination and treatment by a multidisciplinary medical board. A three-member bench headed by Justice Shahid Waheed and comprising Justices Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Ishtiaq Ibr­ahim issued the interim directions on petitions seeking Imran’s hospitalisation, access to personal physicians and family members and provision of his medical record to his family. The court also allowed his personal physician and sister to remain associated with his medical care and directed authorities to facilitate regular family contact. However, the government on Wednesday approached the SC to review and recall its order, arguing that the directive was discriminatory and issued in violation of prison rules and principles of natural justice. Moved through the Islamabad chief commissioner under Article 188 of the Constitution, the review petition argued that Rule 197 of the Pakistan Prison Rules, 1978, which governs the manner and mode of transferring a prisoner to a hospital, had escaped the SC’s attention while issuing directives for shifting the former prime minister from Adiala jail to the private hospital in Islamabad. Had the Supreme Court taken note of this provision of law, the order under review could not have been passed, argued the review petition filed through Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) Advocate General Naveed Hayat Malik on behalf of the chief commissioner. The review petition contended that ordering the treatment of a convict in a private hospital, and that too on the basis of a report that did not disclose any condition requiring immediate medical treatment, would severely disturb the entire criminal justice system. The petition highlighted that Article 25 of the Constitution bestowed a fundamental right to be treated equally and that the Constitution abhorred discrimination and favouritism. Similarly placed convicts would claim the same special treatment afforded to the respondent, in violation of the prison rules, the petition said. It contended that the Aug 18 order was discriminatory in nature, as similarly placed prisoners had not been afforded the same opportunity of receiving medical treatment at private hospitals of their own choosing, the petition contended.